Peer Review Explanation
review at least two papers. If you do not review at least two The paper layout could like the following.
Introduction of what you are doing
Peer Reviews
Students #1 Peer Review
Student # 2 answers questions about
Students #1 Paper
a. Was this a disruptive innovation? Why
or Why not?
b. Explain what type of intellectual
capital protection this innovation might require.
c. Explain what creative thinking
process was applied.
d. Explain what type(s) of technology
might be used to support this innovation.
e. Describe how the success of the
innovation will be measured.
Student # 3 answers questions about
Students #1 Paper
a. Was this a disruptive innovation? Why
or Why not?
b. Explain what type of intellectual
capital protection this innovation might require.
c. Explain what creative thinking
process was applied.
d. Explain what type(s) of technology
might be used to support this innovation.
e. Describe how the success of the
innovation will be measured.
Keep this up until everyone has reviewed
each other’s paper. The answers for the questions do not have to be novels.
Just cover the question don’t worry about the 400 words. Quality not
quantity!!!
I will send the two papers in attachments when I rely back.
