Provide responses of 500-750 words for the whole assignment and question #5 for should have at least 200 of the complete word count. Case Summary requirements: needed to be formatted like the example list under question #1. The case brief serves as your own personal notes summarizing the case. Case Analysis. Your case analysis will be accomplished by answering questions in each section. Make sure to genuinely explore how you would handle these situations if you were an executive for a particular business. Apply business and legal concepts that you have learned from your reading to each case. Use at least 4 references
Copying and pasting blocks of text will not earn academic credit. No more than ten percent (10%) of written work can be directly quoted from the source. Must use in-text and 4 references all together.
Case Summary
1.Brief the case
Names of Case:
Court:
Citation:
Parties and roles:
Facts:
Issues:
Lower court decision:
Decision:
Reasoning:
Case Analysis
2. What were the major points in the dissenting brief prepared by Justices Scalia and Thomas?
3. Was Martin an employee seeking an accommodation or a member of the public seeking accommodation? What are the differences?
4. What are the requirements for a “reasonable accommodation” and would the use of a cart during play fall within these guidelines?
Executive Decision
5. Assume that you are the chair of the PGA Rules Committee. Following the Martin decision, you are charged with reviewing the rules and developing a policy on how to determine reasonable accommodation. What should your policy be? How would you determine “reasonable?”
