I need serious help and original work in this assignment. You may select any business-related case decided by a state court, a federal court, or the United States Supreme Court. This analysis should be no more than four pages, doubles-spaced. Reference and citations are to adhere to APA formatting and style guideline. Please read Chapter 12, “Torts,” chapter 13 Strict Liability and Product Liability,” Chapter 24 “Consumer Protection.” By Miller, R.L., & Cross, .F. B. (2014) the legal environment of business: Text and case-ethical, regulatory, global, and corporate issues (9th ed). Mason, OH: South-Western.
This assignment is on Case Law Analysis – Tort Law
Please ensure to include Summarizes the importance, context, purpose, and relevance of law in a business environment; presents the facts of the case to illustrate the context, purpose, and relevance. Evaluates key judicial concepts that influence the decisions related to business; provides examples and cites dissenting rules and reasons for dissent.
Using your selected court decision, prepare an analysis that responds to the following:
1. Articulates the importance, context, purpose, and relevance of law in a business environment:
Identify the parties who are before the court.
Provide a brief background to problem. Summarize the facts in no more than 3-4 paragraphs.
Identify what is the specific disagreement between the parties.
Explain the ruling of the court in no more than 2-3 paragraphs.
2. Evaluates key judicial concepts that influence the decisions related to business:
Was there a dissenting opinion? If so, explain why some of the judges or justices disagreed with the majority in the decision.
Finally, do you agree with the court’s decision? Why or why not?
You may choose any court case, either state or federal, as the basis for your case law analysis; however, the case should be applicable to the assignment topic. The recommended Web sites for researching and locating a case are listed in the Resources area
**Bonus question for extra point on Commercial Tort Law. No more than 1-2 paragraph. May give example.
Are there situations where companies should be liable to those who have been injured even if the company has not been careless?