Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Template NUR 513 Week 2
Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Template – Advanced registered nurses work in highly collaborative environments and must collaborate with interdisciplinary teams in order to provide excellent patient care. Besides knowing the role and scope of one’s own practice, it is essential to understand the role and scope of other nurse specialties to ensure effective collaboration among nurses, the organization, and other professionals with whom advanced registered nurses regularly interact.
Use the “Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Template” to differentiate how advanced registered nurse roles relate to and collaborate with different areas of nursing practice. Compare your future role with one of the following: nurse educator; nurse leader; family nurse practitioner; acute care nurse practitioner; graduate nurse with an emphasis/specialty in public health, health care administration, business, or informatics; clinical nurse specialist; doctor of nursing practice. Indicate in the appropriate columns on the template which roles you are comparing.
Make sure to compare the following areas of practice in your graphic organizer:
- Ethics
- Education
- Leadership
- Public Health
- Health Care Administration
- Informatics
- Business/Finance
- Specialty (e.g., Family, Acute Care)
Include any regulatory bodies or certification agencies that provide guidance or parameters on how these roles incorporate concepts into practice.
You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents
sing Roles Graphic Organizer
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
80.00%
3
Satisfactory
88.00%
4
Good
92.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Criteria
10.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Ethics
A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is not included.
A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is present.
A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to ethics is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
10.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Education
A comparison of roles in relation to education is not included.
A comparison of roles in relation to education is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A comparison of roles in relation to education is present.
A comparison of roles in relation to education is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to education is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
10.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Leadership
A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is not included.
A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is present.
A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to leadership is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
10.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Public Health
A comparison of roles in relation to public health is not included.
A comparison of roles in relation to public health is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A comparison of roles in relation to public health is present.
A comparison of roles in relation to public health is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to public health is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
10.0 %Comparison Roles in Relation to Health Care Administration
A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is not included.
A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is present.
A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
10.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Informatics
A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is not included.
A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is present.
A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to informatics is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
10.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Business or Finance
A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is not included.
A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is present.
A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
5.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Specialty
A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is not included.
A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is present.
A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to specialty is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
5.0 %Required Sources
Sources are not included.
Number of required sources is only partially met.
Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.
Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all
sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
5.0 %Visual Appeal
There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography is evident.
Color is garish or typographic variations are overused and
legibility suffers. Background interferes with readability.
Understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships is limited.
Minimal use of graphic elements is evident. Elements do not
consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and
relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout.
Thematic graphic elements are used but not always in context. Visual
connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas,
and relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and
consistently.
Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual
connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and
relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and
consistently.
5.0 %Presentation
The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements.
The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements.
The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing.
The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements.
The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication
of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is
employed.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are
present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly
distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and
audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be
present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and
figures of speech.
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage
