PLEASE WRITE 7+ SENTENCES PER PEER REVIEW IN A POSITIVE AND TALK DIRECTLY TO THE CLASSMATE
2) PEER REVIEW #1 (SHERICE)
Good Afternoon Professor and Class,
The Scenario I chose is,
Keith agrees to transport ceramic figurines from Los Angeles to New York City in his moving truck. What he doesn’t know is that each figurine is filled packets of cocaine.
My response to do this is: The promise that was made by Keith is enforceable according to the legality of it. The law states if it’s in your possession at the time, then it’s yours unless someone confesses to it. If the capacity of the cocaine is high then Keith will be looking at FED time..
3) PEER REVIEW #2 (TANYA)
I decided to discuss the two females who are drinking at a bar and decided to trade a 3-carat diamond ring for a 78 Ford Duster. This agreement is a bilateral contract because both parties promise to do something. It is not enforceable by law because it is an unenforceable agreement which the promise was made verbally by both parties. The verbal agreement posses consideration for Maria and Jennifer to exchange the 3-carat diamond ring for a 78 Ford Duster since each item hold value. In this case of the of them struck a deal. Even though both parties were intoxicated and made an irrational agreement, both ladies are in a jam because they need to honor the verbal contract. Maria and Jennifer were aware of what was going around them, especially if they can drive home drunk, they can honor a verbal agreement. If one of the ladies wants to back out of the contract, one must provide evidence that she did not understand the nature of the agreement or the basis of the deal that was made.
