SOWK 7328 Our Lady of the Lake University Hispanic Infant/ Toddler Analysis

One
Before you can assess the work of your peers, you must first assess two example submissions.
One example is well done – the other is poorly done.
Work to determine which example is which. Also give feed back on both paper. Read through each prompt either yes are no and give feed back.

No Submission || ONLY choose this option if there is NOT a submitted document to review.

Unacceptable || Does not integrate theories, concepts, trends, and /or issues related to textbook, readings and discussions.There is no inclusion of a holistic description of the child from a humanistic lens. Paper is void of information surrounding: cognition, maturation, emotional regulation and social connections. Student included minimial information regarding the theoretical frameworks essential for the child’s developmental stage and integrated an assessment of the cultural context, individualized and collective strengths as well as challenges that could impact relationships for the Latino family interviewed and observed.

Emerging || Identifies theories, concepts, trends, and/or issues from textbook and readings; however, does not effectively demonstrate integration in discussion. There is limited inclusion of a holistic description of the child from a humanistic lens. Iimited discussion around: cognition, maturation, emotional regulation and social connections. Student included minimial information regarding the theoretical frameworks essential for the child’s developmental stage and integrated an assessment of the cultural context, individualized and collective strengths as well as challenges that could impact relationships for the Latino family interviewed and observed.

Proficient || Appropriately integrates theories and concepts from the text and readings and demonstrates critical thinking. Appropriate inclusion of a holistic description of the child from a humanistic lens. Includes some discussion around: cognition, maturation, emotional regulation and social connections. Student included some information regarding the theoretical frameworks essential for the child’s developmental stage and integrated an assessment of the cultural context, individualized and collective strengths as well as challenges that could impact relationships for the Latino family interviewed and observed.

Exemplary || Identifies and integrates relevant theories, concepts, trends, and/or issues from the textbook, readings and course discussions relevant to the discussion; demonstrates proficiency in critical thinking skills. Paper offers a holistic description of the child from a humanistic lens to include but not limited to: cognition, maturation, emotional regulation and social connections. Student included discussions around the theoretical frameworks essential for the child’s developmental stage and integrated an assessment of the cultural context, individualized and collective strengths as well as challenges that could impact relationships for the Latino family interviewed and observed.

Comprehensive-ness and in-depth understanding of the topic

No Submission || ONLY choose this option if there is NOT a submitted document to review.

Unacceptable || Does not address most of the questions and/or writing prompts. Little or no self-disclosure, minimal risk in connecting concepts from course to personal experiences. Disclosures tend to be superficial and factual, without self-reflection.

Emerging || Partially addresses the questions and/or writing prompts which conveys limited understanding of the topic. Cautiously approaches concepts. Sometimes defensive or one-sided in self-appraisal

Proficient || Adequately addresses the questions and/or writing prompts; and includes an introduction and a conclusion. Seeks to understand concepts by applying to own experience. Sometimes one-sided self appraisal.

Exemplary || Comprehensively addresses the questions and/or writing prompts; demonstrates an in-depth understanding of the topic by providing a good introduction and insightful conclusion. Seeks to understand concepts by applying to own experiences in non-defensive way that shows maturity and insight.

Logic and Argumentation

No Submission || ONLY choose this option if there is NOT a submitted document to review.

Unacceptable || Does not address topic; misses important questions in the writing prompts

Writing Skills

No Submission || ONLY choose this option if there is NOT a submitted document to review.

Unacceptable || Poorly written; illogical; contains errors that distort the message.

Emerging || Organize answers/responses to show minimal understanding of the topic

Proficient || Presents content with logic; well-organized writing skills provides relevant examples

Exemplary || Demonstrates skills in scholarly writing; logically organizes content and ideas; cogently and clearly presents arguments and responses; provides supporting evidence and example.

Structure

No Submission || ONLY choose this option if there is NOT a submitted document to review.

Unacceptable || Unclear, often because central theme is weak or non-existent; transitions confusing and unclear; few topic sentences

Emerging || Generally unclear, often wanders or jumps around; few or weak transitions; many paragraphs without topic sentences

Proficient || Generally clear and appropriate, though may wander occasionally; may have a few unclear transitions or a few paragraphs without strong topic sentences

Exemplary || Evident, understandable, and appropriate for family practice paper; excellent transitions from point to point’ paragraphs support solid topic sentences. There is inclusion of organizations/systems observed or mentioned by caregiver and there is evidence of consent and confidentiality.

Mechanics

No Submission || ONLY choose this option if there is NOT a submitted document to review.

Unacceptable || Significant problems in grammar and diction; frequent major errors in citation style, punctuation, and spelling; may have many run-on sentences and comma splices.The paper lacks consistent use proper citation, peer reviewed articles for references and APA formatting. Major errors exist. The paper is not within the allotted 5-6 page requirement for this assignment.

Emerging || Problems in grammar and diction (usually not major); errors in punctuation, citation style, and spelling; may have several run-on sentences or comma splices. The paper does not consistently use proper citation, peer reviewed articles for references and APA formatting. several errors exist. The paper is not within the allotted 5-6 page requirement for this assignment.

Proficient || Grammar, and diction strong despite occasional lapses; punctuation and citation style often used correctly; some (minor) spelling errors; may have one run-on sentence or comma splice. Although the paper uses proper citation, peer reviewed articles for references and APA formatting some errors exist. The paper is within the allotted 5-6 page requirement for this assignment.

Exemplary ||Grammar, and diction excellent; correct use of punctuation and citation style; minimal to no spelling errors; absolutely no run-on sentences or comma splices. The paper uses proper citation, peer reviewed articles for references and APA formatting. The paper is within the allotted 5-6 page requirement for this assignment.