In the United States, habitual offender laws (commonly referred to as three-strikes laws) are statutes enacted by state governments which mandate courts to impose harsher sentences on those convicted of an offense if they have been previously convicted of two prior serious criminal offenses. They are designed to keep those more likely to commit crime from being able to continue that pattern. Read the pros and cons below. In addition, you are also tasked with discussing why you agree or disagree with three strike laws.
- The Pros of Three Strikes Law
–Harsh Punishment for Habitual Offenders – Career offenders that received a lighter verdict and reoffended the same nature of crime are now serving their punishment of lifetime imprisonment behind the bars of the cell.
–Lesser Crime Rate – The crime rate in a particular state reduced upon adopting this law.
–Preventive Measure for Career Felon – This is a big threat to habitual offenders giving them no other option but to have a new life.
–Additional Peace of Mind for Citizens – People in a particular place which has this kind of law have a bit of a relief for their worries are a little bit lightened though.
–Effective Crime Control – The authorities, the police officers can have a more focus on their duties as they will now deal with a lesser number of law offenders.
- The Cons of Three Strikes Law
–Additional Cost to Prison and Courts – Three strike law increased the operational cost of courts and prisons by up to 50%.
–Over Population in Cells – it brings additional population to prison cells.
–Decline in Number of Law Enforcer – because of the cost being compensated to offenders, the state will cut gross resulting to fewer law enforcement officer recruit.
–Unfair Law – light crimes committed by an individual like shoplifting, writing bad checks and some of this kind are not exempted on this law. They too can spend the rest of their lives if they commit the same crime three times.